What if it had happened in Burma?

A lot of people are upset at the mass shooting in Connecticut. Partly that’s because they empathise and approach events in a personal way. And it’s an important, first, human response. But it only scrapes the surface. If you approach it in a political or historical or sociological way, you actually end up saying things like: well, what do you expect? Newton is just just one symptom of a psychotic America

The fact is America is a very violent society. Like Britain. Already we lock up more per head than anyone else in Europe. America has a formidable full 1% of its population in the prison system – another world leader… Only a few years ago we were measured by the UN to be the worst place to bring up children, presumable beating America. These measures reflect the amount of stress in a society. One very important measure is how unfair a society is, how wealth is distributed. Under 13 years of Labour, Britain became more and more unfair year after year, the rich getting richer at a far more rapid rate than everyone else. Something far surpassed by America which is unmatched for taking wealth from around the planet to itself.

But can you imagine if we in Britain had the same prevalence of gun ownership here – and the right to bear arms? Despite our general drop in crime statistics in would be a recipe for sure disaster and we could expect our Newton’s and Columbine’s and Aurora’s to take place.

America, like us, suffers from a whole variety of negative social factors – inequality of ownership, inequality of access to healthcare, large and growing homelessness – and of course has social injustice at far higher levels than we do.

Those that have visited America may not see this and may argue what a wonderful, welcoming place it is – great if that’s your experience. But that’s NOT the point I’m making. That’s the sort of personal point of view that I began with. The OTHER things that happen in society, policies, politics, where the money goes, how power asserts and protects itself, sets the background for how healthy a society really is.

This includes levels of mental illness in society and has something to say about those who snap and go on a killing spree. There is no doubt gun control would reduce this, as it did in Australia. A very simple short-term solution.

But America, as a larger organism, is quite psychotic. Maybe Britain was like this in its Empire times – ruling half the globe, and built on the simple racist idea that the Englishman was superior to everyone else (no doubt a factor that made many of the wealthy rather sympathetic to Hitler).

The almost 50-50 polls, even after mass killings like this one, show that America isn’t ready for change either, even in this simple direction.  Of course, the role the gun lobby and its resources play should not be neglected.

But, historically, this is a global issue too. The strength of the gun industry depends on gun ownership, just as the arms industry depends on America’s unparalleled violence across the world: Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Central America in the 1980s, the wrecking of other countries like Iran in 1953, bringing the Ba’ath party to power in Iraq in the 1960s, and on and on.

The fact that the American population seem to back most of this international violence chimes with their 50-50 vote to keep guns even after mass killings like Newton’s. Much of this is a tribute to its one party politics (with two faces) and a highly controlled media, very concentrated in terms of ownership and all saying the same sort of corporation-friendly things – while still coming across as very human.

Obama is as compromised too. Squeeze out the odd tear he may on national TV, but he has had no compunction about sending the 170 children his drones have killed to there fiery deaths. Collateral damage, distance, people of no account.

Over here the sheer amount of US media that many of us watch colours our take on its society, the fun of the sit-coms, the brilliance of Hollywood, the apparent concer of its leading politicians. But if someone had walked into a classroom, say in Burma, and gunned down 20 children, people might tut and say what a terrible shame, but they would tend to know less about it and write it off as a violent country. America gets a pass. It shouldn’t. It’s one of the most violent countries in the world. And we’re not far behind…

Any meaningful commitment to peace in society there should ban guns. Maybe then there would be the chance the people could actually reject America’s violence across the world.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “What if it had happened in Burma?

    • Indeed it is, just as workfare is being touted as the way to get people working,under the threat of removing their benefits.

      The Green Party is against the major changes to education represented by so-called free schools and the academy system. Academies are an American idea, a stepping-stone to privatisation, and a way of gradually getting schools out of the tax-funded public sector. Government has the power to make it attractive, even to primary schools, to become academies. At the same time, they are attacking teaching unions and threatening pension provision. The departure from properly funded state education is a poisoned chalice for most.

      My article began on the theme of simple cold, calculated violence and a state that enables it. Now violence is being done by the state, to our systems of welfare, health and education.

  1. Quiz for someone with ambitions for representing green party in Hull

    1) What is the population of your constituency ?
    2) What are the employment figures ?
    3) What are the health figures ?
    4) How many people are employed in environmental work in your constituency ?
    5) What are the 5 most prevalent pollutants in the local air ?
    6) What are the 5 most pressing local environmental health problems ?
    7) What are the 5 best solutions to the 5 most pressing env. problems ?
    8) Name any endangered species within your constituency.
    9) Name the 5 most prevalent tree species in your constiuency.
    10) Name, privacy allowing, 5 people harmed by environmental issues within your prospective constituency within the last year.

    Why not show your constituents you are on the ball, by having such figures on your website ?

    • 1) The population of Hull is around 238,000. Each of the 3 constituencies have around 60.000 voters.
      2) Unemployment is dire in Hull. Recently Hull held the national record for youth unemployment. Currently, around 55 applications are received for any given job.
      3) Health also scores poorly for Hull. we support the rest of the table along with Glasgow. Greens are actively involved in the Hull Save the NHS campaign. It is unconscionable that Government is cutting our area NHS by £99 million. 2 wards have gone, 8 wards slated. This will cost lives.
      4) Employment in environmental work is negligible. We should include the parks provision. The hedge and verge trimmers less so, as their approach is the basic slash and burn. However, there is a green business network and many businesses are building in good practices, such as minimising waste, regular recycling, energy and water conservation,
      5) The most prevalent pollutants would be traffic fumes, and vents from industries along the River Hull, such as the tannery. The cocoa plant has closed.
      6) Local environmental health problems: the extent to which asthma is environmental (child stress, family stress, traffic and other pollution
      7) 5 best solutions to the 5 most pressing env. problems: less traffic (especially integrating the bus services more, having discount tickets, usable on multiple services, etc), encouraging green spaces, and green corridors across the city for wildlife,
      8) Endangered species within Hull are similar to to those in other urban areas: stag beetle, great crested newt, butterflies (planting buddleia is a great encouragement), wild flowers in general (allowing areas to grow wild is helpful). Knowledge of these is not widespread.
      9) Tree species within the area include: beech, chestnut, lime, larch, oak and poplar.
      10) People harmed by environmental issues in the last year is tricky. In 1990 a top candidate was Capper Pass smelting and a possible cancer cluster associated with its plume. The plant was shut down due to popular grassroots action. Asthma is endemic among children. There are various factors. The Green Party favours less stress on children, especially through education. Also greater awareness about the amount of powerful cleaners in our homes, anti-bacterials, etc, which may have cumulative effects affecting health and immunity. It’s a concern in the last few years that many primary schools are overseeing children brushing their teeth after lunch, including swallowing the toothpaste. First it’s not a teacher’s duty, second, fluoride is contra-indicated in a number of health problems and shouldn’t be swallowed.

      Thank you for your interest.

  2. Not bad, not bad. Didn’t kow we have stag beetles round here.
    You need a fancier web presence if you want to compete though, I think. Even better if you become the go-to place for local environmental info.

    Three more –

    What is the best computer recycling place in the area ?
    How much money did Croda make/save from their windmill in 2012 ?
    What are the prospects for wind power in Hull ?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s